Utility of apical four-chamber longitudinal strain in the assessment of childhood cancer survivors: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: A previous multicenter study showed that longitudinal changes in standard cardiac functional parameters were associated with the development of cardiomyopathy in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Evaluation of the relationship between global longitudinal strain (GLS) changes and cardiomyopathy risk was limited, largely due to lack of quality apical 2- and 3-chamber views in addition to 4-chamber view. We sought to determine whether apical 4-chamber longitudinal strain (A4LS) alone can serve as a suitable surrogate for GLS in this population. METHODS: A4LS and GLS were measured in echocardiograms with acceptable apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views. Correlation was evaluated using Pearson and Spearman coefficients, and agreement was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. The ability of A4LS to identify normal and abnormal values compared to GLS as the reference was evaluated. RESULTS: Among a total of 632 reviewed echocardiograms, we identified 130 echocardiograms from 56 patients with adequate views (38% female; mean age at cancer diagnosis 8.3 years; mean follow-up 9.4 years). Correlation coefficients between A4LS and GLS were .89 (Pearson) and .85 (Spearman), with Bland-Altman plot of GLS-A4LS showing a mean difference of -.71 ± 1.8. Compared with GLS as the gold standard, A4LS had a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 79%-93%) and specificity of 82% (69%-95%) when using normal range cutoffs and 90% (82%-97%) and 70% (58%-81%) when using ±2 standard deviations. CONCLUSION: A4LS performs well when compared with GLS in this population. Given the more recent adoption of apical 2- and 3-chamber views in most pediatric echocardiography laboratories, A4LS is a reasonable stand-alone measurement in retrospective analyses of older study cohorts and echocardiogram biorepositories.

ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

This document is the second of 2 companion appropriate use criteria (AUC) documents developed by the American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The first document1 addresses the evaluation and use of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, whereas this document addresses this topic with regard to structural (nonvalvular) heart disease. While dealing with different subjects, the 2 documents do share a common structure and feature some clinical overlap. The goal of the companion AUC documents is to provide a comprehensive resource for multimodality imaging in the context of structural and valvular heart disease, encompassing multiple imaging modalities. Using standardized methodology, the clinical scenarios (indications) were developed by a diverse writing group to represent patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included common applications and anticipated uses. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines. A separate, independent rating panel scored the 102 clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario. The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of these scenarios by practices that will improve and standardize physician decision making. AUC publications reflect an ongoing effort by the American College of Cardiology to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations in which diagnostic tests and procedures are utilized by physicians caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases. The process is based on the current understanding of the technical capabilities of the imaging modalities examined.

Quantitative Assessment of Ventricular Septal Contour for Estimation of Right Ventricular Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Qualitative assessment of ventricular septal flattening is commonly used in pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) who lack adequate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) Doppler signal. We sought to determine the relation between quantitative measures of septal flattening including the eccentricity index (EIs) and a novel marker, the septal flattening angle (SFA) with right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). METHODS: Subjects (≤18 years) with an anatomically normal heart, an adequate TR signal to obtain a peak velocity, and a simultaneous systemic systolic blood pressure (SBP) was included. RVSP was derived using TR gradient. Eccentricity index (EIs) and the SFA in systole were measured offline and correlated with RVSP/SBP. RESULTS: Of the 108 subjects, RVSP/SBP was < 50% in 77 and ≥ 50% in 31. In those with RVSP/SBP ≥50%, the median SFA was significantly lower (7.4° vs. 22°, p < 0.0001), and the median EIs was higher (1.61 vs. 1.07, p < 0.0001). SFA and EIs had a significant correlation with RVSP/SBP (rs = -0.70 and 0.61, respectively). Area under the curve was higher for SFA compared to EIs (0.92 and 0.85, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of SFA for predicting an RVSP/SBP ≥ 50% using a cut point of 16° was 84% and 95% and for an EIs cut point of 1.35 was 74.2% and 96.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Septal flattening angle and EIs are quantitative measures of ventricular septal flattening that correlate well with RVSP/SBP and should be considered more routinely in clinical practice, especially in patients with inadequate TR Doppler signal.

Tissue Doppler Imaging-derived Diastolic Function Assessment in Children With Sickle Cell Disease and Its Relation With Ferritin.

Diastolic dysfunction has been shown to occur earlier than systolic dysfunction in iron overload states in adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived E/E' has emerged as a noninvasive marker of diastolic function. We sought to determine diastolic function in children with SCD and study its relation with iron overload. A retrospective review of medical records of 225 pediatric patients with SCD who received an echocardiogram between January 2008 and December 2012 was performed. Echocardiographic measures including M-mode, spectral Doppler, and TDI-derived E/E' were compared with previously published data in healthy children. The left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions were significantly higher in SCD (P<0.0001) and the shortening fraction was similar (P=0.66). E/E' ratio was significantly higher in SCD at the mitral annulus, septum, and tricuspid annulus. In 54% of subjects, the septal E/E' was >8, indicating elevated left ventricular filling pressure. However, there was no significant correlation between ferritin level and E/E' ratios. Pediatric patients with SCD have a high prevalence of elevated estimated left ventricular filling pressure, but this does not correlate with ferritin levels.

Syncope Best Practices: A Syncope Clinical Practice Guideline to Improve Quality.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether implementation of a standardized clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the evaluation of syncope would decrease practice variability and resource utilization. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records of patients presenting to our practice for outpatient evaluation of syncope before and after implementation of the CPG. The guideline included elements of history, physical exam, electrocardiogram, and "red flags" for further testing. SETTING: Outpatient pediatric cardiology offices of a large pediatric cardiology practice. PATIENTS: All new patients between 3 and 21 years old, who presented to cardiology clinic with a chief complaint of syncope. INTERVENTIONS: The CPG for the evaluation of pediatric syncope was presented to the providers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Resource utilization was determined by the tests ordered by individual physicians before and after initiation of the CPG. Patient final diagnoses were recorded and the medical records were subsequently reviewed to determine if any patients, who presented again to the system, were ultimately diagnosed with cardiac disease. RESULTS: Of the 1496 patients with an initial visit for syncope, there was no significant difference in the diagnosis of cardiac disease before or after initiation of the CPG: (0.6% vs. 0.4%, P = .55). Electrocardiography provides the highest yield in the evaluation of pediatric syncope. Despite high compliance (86.9%), there were no overall changes in costs ($346.31 vs. $348.53, P = .85) or in resource utilization. There was, however, a decrease in the variability of ordering of echocardiograms among physicians, particularly among those at the extremes of utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Although the CPG did not decrease already low costs, it did decrease the wide variability in echo utilization. Evaluation beyond detailed history, physical exam, and electrocardiography provides no additional benefit in the evaluations of pediatric patients presenting with syncope.